Gaffit
|
*Enters battle topic*
*Sees someone say that a battle needs reviewing*
*Sees hard to read colored text*
*Sigh*
I'm on it.
|
|
|
|
|
zeldafan42
|
I hope you don't mean me. I just use Black text with the Red Glow because in Bob's opinion "it makes him seem special." In other words, his distinct text effect is supposed to be part of his characterization.
I can change it if you want.
|
|
|
|
Gaffit
|
*Just finished reading*
O_-
What the hell was that? That was the most godmodiest god-mode fest since the time Zeus got in a drunken bar fight with all of Olympus.
Salty, please explain to me exactly and as unvaguley as possible exactly what your powers allow you to do other than controlling the motion of objects.
|
|
|
|
Hawk_v3
|
Hehehe...
*sits back with popcorn*
|
|
|
|
Ƨɒlƚy
|
They allow me to take, give, and transfer the kinetic energy of objects. However, when you can do this on an sub-atomic level, many things are possible.
|
|
« Last Edit: 15 July, 2008, 03:31:44 pm by Haseo the Xth »
|
Report Spam
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
zeldafan42
|
...if at any point in the fight I was out of hand, let me know and I'll rectify it in the future.
Normally Bob wouldn't have used some of those tactics, but as you can guess, I felt...pressured to try and keep up with my opponent.
|
|
|
|
Hawk_v3
|
They allow me to take, give, and transfer the kinetic energy of objects. However, when you can do this on an sub-atomic level, many things are possible.
Vague. Needs limits. Is in fact crying out to be limited.
|
|
|
|
Gaffit
|
The allow me to take, give, and transfer the kinetic energy of objects. However, when you can do this on an sub-atomic level, many things are possible.
So, you basically have an ability that as a sub-ability allows you to use Atomic Manipulation, which is an ability that comes with strict limitations and has only been used a handfull of times in the history of CoS. You are not allowed to have any one ability that instantly allows you to kill your opponent at any time and doesn't give them the chance to dodge. Otherwise if you had firecontrol, you could simply set your opponents insides on fire. If you have water control, you could flood your opponents lungs. All abilities have limiters in some way shape or form that are done out of fairness for play, and you should apply some of those limits to your own ability. Do you see where I'm going with this? And if someone asks who how you are doing what you are doing, you are required to give them an explanation that satisfies them.
|
|
|
|
Ƨɒlƚy
|
Yeah, I understand. After all, my limiter is that I never use my ability on my opponent directly. It's just that simple. Catastrophix will never mess with his opponent's kinetic energy. And as for the explanations, it's kind of hard to explain things when it requires a science lecture right in the middle. I'll try, but if I get asked for explanations, I'm going to have to get windy.
|
|
|
|
Gaffit
|
Yeah, I understand. After all, my limiter is that I never use my ability on my opponent directly. It's just that simple. Catastrophix will never mess with his opponent's kinetic energy. And as for the explanations, it's kind of hard to explain things when it requires a science lecture right in the middle. I'll try, but if I get asked for explanations, I'm going to have to get windy.
You stopped the fluctuation of air to Bob's lungs. I think that constitutes as using it against your opponent directly. You even said several times throughout the battle, "I can kill you anytime I want, but it's more fun to fight you" Implying that you would use it against her later.
|
|
|
|
Ƨɒlƚy
|
Ah, but the air in Bob's lungs is not part of Bob. And when I say that, it means that I'm going easy on them, not that I'm just going to insta-kill them.
|
|
|
|
Gaffit
|
Ah, but the air in Bob's lungs is not part of Bob. And when I say that, it means that I'm going easy on them, not that I'm just going to insta-kill them.
That's a goddamn technicallity and you know it. You're stretching your own limiters. A fire user could easily burn the air in someone's lungs claiming the same thing, but it's still god-moding.
|
|
|
|
Ƨɒlƚy
|
Ah, but the air in Bob's lungs is not part of Bob. And when I say that, it means that I'm going easy on them, not that I'm just going to insta-kill them.
That's a goddamn technicallity and you know it. You're stretching your own limiters. A fire user could easily burn the air in someone's lungs claiming the same thing, but it's still god-moding. I'm defining my own limiters. And your hypothetical fire user would get disqualified for an insta-kill. Mine would simply have put Bob to sleep eventually, thereby winning me the match, providing he hadn't found a way to get around it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|